<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>chilldor blog &#187; Web 3.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.chilldor.com/category/web-30/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.chilldor.com</link>
	<description>...where cool communications happen...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 18:11:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>What is Web 3.0?</title>
		<link>http://blog.chilldor.com/2009/02/11/what-is-web-30/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.chilldor.com/2009/02/11/what-is-web-30/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 05:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chilldor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advantages & Disadvantages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 3.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.chilldor.com/?p=161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Chilldor
Some quotes what is Web 3.0:
In May 2006, Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web stated:[16]


People keep asking what Web 3.0 is. I think maybe when you&#8217;ve got an overlay of scalable vector graphics—everything rippling and folding and looking misty—on Web 2.0 and access to a semantic Web integrated across a huge space [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>by Chilldor</strong></p>
<p>Some quotes what is Web 3.0:</p>
<p>In May 2006, <a title="Tim Berners-Lee" href="/wiki/Tim_Berners-Lee">Tim Berners-Lee</a>, inventor of the World Wide Web stated:<sup id="cite_ref-STBL.2C_2006_15-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-STBL.2C_2006-15"><span>[</span>16<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<blockquote class="templatequote">
<div>
<p>People keep asking what Web 3.0 is. I think maybe when you&#8217;ve got an overlay of <a class="mw-redirect" title="Scalable vector graphics" href="/wiki/Scalable_vector_graphics">scalable vector graphics</a>—everything rippling and folding and looking misty—on Web 2.0 and access to a semantic Web integrated across a huge space of data, you&#8217;ll have access to an unbelievable data resource.</div>
<div class="templatequotecite">—<cite><a title="Tim Berners-Lee" href="/wiki/Tim_Berners-Lee">Tim Berners-Lee</a>, <a class="external text" title="http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/05/23/business/web.php" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/05/23/business/web.php">A &#8216;more revolutionary&#8217; World Wide Web</a></cite></div>
</blockquote>
<p>At the <a title="Seoul Digital Forum" href="/wiki/Seoul_Digital_Forum">Seoul Digital Forum</a> in May 2007, <a class="mw-redirect" title="Eric Schmidt" href="/wiki/Eric_Schmidt">Eric Schmidt</a>, CEO of Google, was asked to define Web 2.0 and Web 3.0.<sup id="cite_ref-16" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-16"><span>[</span>17<span>]</span></a></sup> He responded:</p>
<blockquote class="templatequote">
<div>
<p>Web 2.0 is a marketing term, and I think you&#8217;ve just invented Web 3.0.</p>
<p>But if I were to guess what Web 3.0 is, I would tell you that it&#8217;s a different way of building applications&#8230; My prediction would be that Web 3.0 will ultimately be seen as applications which are pieced together. There are a number of characteristics: the applications are relatively small, the data is in the cloud, the applications can run on any device, PC or mobile phone, the applications are very fast and they&#8217;re very customizable. Furthermore, the applications are distributed virally: literally by social networks, by email. You won&#8217;t go to the store and purchase them&#8230; That&#8217;s a very different application model than we&#8217;ve ever seen in computing.</p></div>
<div class="templatequotecite">—<cite><a class="mw-redirect" title="Eric Schmidt" href="/wiki/Eric_Schmidt">Eric Schmidt</a></cite></div>
</blockquote>
<p>At the Technet Summit in <a title="November 2006" href="/wiki/November_2006">November 2006</a>, <a title="Jerry Yang (entrepreneur)" href="/wiki/Jerry_Yang_(entrepreneur)">Jerry Yang</a>, founder and Chief of <a class="mw-redirect" title="Yahoo" href="/wiki/Yahoo">Yahoo</a>, stated:<sup id="cite_ref-Farber.2C_2006_17-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Farber.2C_2006-17"><span>[</span>18<span>]</span></a></sup></p>
<blockquote class="templatequote">
<div>
<p>Web 2.0 is well documented and talked about. The power of the Net reached a critical mass, with capabilities that can be done on a network level. We are also seeing richer devices over last four years and richer ways of interacting with the network, not only in hardware like game consoles and mobile devices, but also in the software layer. You don&#8217;t have to be a computer scientist to create a program. We are seeing that manifest in Web 2.0 and 3.0 will be a great extension of that, a true communal medium&#8230;the distinction between professional, semi-professional and consumers will get blurred, creating a network effect of business and applications.</p></div>
<div class="templatequotecite">—<cite><a title="Jerry Yang (entrepreneur)" href="/wiki/Jerry_Yang_(entrepreneur)">Jerry Yang</a></cite></div>
</blockquote>
<p>At the same Technet Summit, <a title="Reed Hastings" href="/wiki/Reed_Hastings">Reed Hastings</a>, founder and CEO of <a title="Netflix" href="/wiki/Netflix">Netflix</a>, stated a simpler formula for defining the phases of the Web:</p>
<blockquote class="templatequote">
<div>
<p>Web 1.0 was dial-up, 50K average bandwidth, Web 2.0 is an average 1 megabit of bandwidth and Web 3.0 will be 10 megabits of bandwidth all the time, which will be the full video Web, and that will feel like Web 3.0.</p></div>
</blockquote>
<p><em>Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_3.0</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.chilldor.com/2009/02/11/what-is-web-30/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What comes after Web 2.0?</title>
		<link>http://blog.chilldor.com/2008/09/03/what-comes-after-web-20/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.chilldor.com/2008/09/03/what-comes-after-web-20/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 18:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Martin Koppel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 3.0]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.chilldor.com/2008/09/03/what-comes-after-web-20/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Martin Koppel
For most of the people Web 2.0 is just a buzzword &#8211; round corners, a bit childish web design but nothing too special. But there are some key elements that make Web 2.0 different from yesterday’s web (Web 1.0).  Major difference is that Web 2.0 websites allow users to do more than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>by Martin Koppel</strong><br />
For most of the people <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_2.0">Web 2.0</a> is just a <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2007/012407-web-20.html">buzzword</a> &#8211; round corners, a bit childish web design but nothing too special. But there are some key elements that make Web 2.0 different from yesterday’s web (Web 1.0).  Major difference is that Web 2.0 websites allow users to do more than just retrieve information &#8211; people are able to create their own content and be part of democratic and organic web.</p>
<p><a title="web2.png" href="http://www.chilldor.com/images/web2.png"><img src="http://www.chilldor.com/images/web2.png" alt="web2.png" /></a></p>
<p>Main keywords for Web 2.0 are <strong>openness, collaboration, dynamic, interactive, context sensitive services, third party content</strong>. Vast majority of the Web 2.0 doesn’t have a good business model behind it, although recently we have seen a bit more of the ones that do. There is also a tendency that services with a business model tend to move away from Web 2.0 ideology (openness, third party content, content sensitivity). I think that Google AdSense is the best example of Web 2.0 with a great business model.<br />
<strong><br />
But what comes next?</strong></p>
<p>I’m not talking about major buzzword <a href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/eric_schmidt_defines_web_30.php">Web 3.0</a>, but we may call it Web 2.5 at least <img src='http://69.89.23.253/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> . We are going to see business models behind wikis, podcasts etc, so that third parties would also be able to earn revenue. We already have some great examples in that field, but this will become a MUST feature in near future. I believe that creating opportunities for third parties is the next phase in the web and it is almost here.</p>
<p>Context sensitivity, third party content and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Long_Tail">long tail</a> are creating opportunities for everyone who has ideas, knowledge and will to do something. Everyone will be able to benefit from their knowledge and experience, and what’s most important &#8211; the business doesn’t have any borders or limits. One is definitely sure, <a href="http://www.sugarattack.com/2007/10/04/web-30-starts-with-your-phone/">mobile services</a> are involved as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.chilldor.com/2008/09/03/what-comes-after-web-20/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

